![]() Furthermore, Japan kept a number of its tanks in reserve both in the home islands and in Manchuria. The Japanese did not keep pace with the developments in tank design that favored increases in armor and gun calibers. Added to this shortfall was the fact that Japanese tanks were of indifferent quality. Japanese production of tanks and self-propelled guns from 1941-1945 numbered only 5,495 (by contrast, the US produced over 100,000 and Germany approximately 50,000). But the anemic state of Japan's tank arm also played a significant role in the relatively rare armored encounters. This was partly a function of geography the terrain (jungles, mountains, islands) inhibited the deployment of large numbers of tanks by either side. Tank to tank combat was very uncommon in the Pacific theater. Previous AMAs | Previous Roundtables Featuresįeature posts are posted weekly. May 25th | Panel AMA with /r/AskBibleScholars Please Subscribe to our Google Calendar for Upcoming AMAs and Events To nominate someone else as a Quality Contributor, message the mods. Our flaired users have detailed knowledge of their historical specialty and a proven record of excellent contributions to /r/AskHistorians. Please Read and Understand the Rules Before Contributing. ![]() Report Comments That Break Reddiquette or the Subreddit Rules. Serious On-Topic Comments Only: No Jokes, Anecdotes, Clutter, or other Digressions. Provide Primary and Secondary Sources If Asked. Write Original, In-Depth and Comprehensive Answers, Using Good Historical Practices. Questions should be clear and specific in what they ask, and should be able to get detailed answers from historians whose expertise is likely to be in particular times and places. Nothing Less Than 20 Years Old, and Don't Soapbox. ![]() Be Nice: No Racism, Bigotry, or Offensive Behavior.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |